Чтобы автоматически перевести этот контент на Pусский язык, используйте ссылку «Выберите свой язык» вверху этой страницы. |
UNSCR 1325 and subsequent resolutions on women, peace and security have helped focus attention on the role of women in peace negotiations and the limited presence of women at the peace table. At the same time women peace builders play a crucial role in building peace at the local level. One of the ways that women peace-builders play this crucial role is through the creation of a culture of peace; whether through women working together across battle lines to ensure live saving support to families; or focusing on practical solvable issues on the ground or by other means.
This important role and the lessons learnt from these experiences deserve more attention. We are interested in learning more about what works at the local level. How have women peace builders contributed to change. What works and how can local experiences be fed into regional or national peace-building efforts?
Please answer the following questions:
- What good examples are there of women’s engagement in local peacebuilding efforts? What is different about these examples? Why did they work? What helped make them work? What didn’t work?
- How have women managed to engage in local political decision-making post-conflict? What effect has that had on others’ lives?
- How do you prevent the return to traditional norms after conflicts end?
- What role has creating a culture of peace played?
- What examples are there of imaginative alternatives that help create a culture of peace? What helped make them work? What didn’t work?
- Was there any outside support that was vital to ensuring women’s engagement? If so, what can we learn from the timing, duration and how that support was given? What support might have helped but wasn’t forthcoming? What support was counter-productive and why?
- How can we ensure that the needs and views of the most marginalized are included? What good examples are there of including disabled women? LGBTQI communities?
Summary of Week 6
Dear participants,
Thank you all for participating in this final week of the consultation. This week, we heard from Latin America, Northern and Southern Africa, Europe, as well as West, South and Southeast Asia, showcasing a rich diversity of approaches and experiences.
The contributions re-iterated and highlighted again some of the key points of the previous weeks. Central among them is the need for meaningful women's participation in peacebuilding at all levels, from the international, over the national and local to the inter-personal and personal. In particular at the local level, in villages and neighbourhoods, women's movements and women’s rights organisations are doing much of the essential work of peacebuilding.
As the examples highlighted, this active and meaningful participation is not only important in terms of peacebuilding in situations of war, also in situations of urban and rural violence such as in parts of Latin America, in the response to the Covid-19 pandemic as highlighted in Mauritius, and in continued political engagement in conflict-affected societies such as in Lebanon, in this case at the municipal level.
Further key points highlighted were the need for
Contributions also stressed the central role of enhancing cultures of peace, of building the connections necessary for peacebuilding at the local level, ensuring women's socio-economic empowerment at the grassroots and value-based peacebuilding.
Explicitly and implicitly, contributors underscored the need for recognising that different approaches and levels (or tracks) of peacebuilding are necessary and need to happen simultaneously – but that ideally these should be coordinated. However, this coordination of efforts should not be based primarily on the concerns and agendas of the international and outside actors, but rather be led by local needs.
Thank you everyone for your active participation, it has been an honour and a pleasure to act as a moderator!
Henri